The Not-So-United States of America: A Tale of Three Colonies and their Shaky Relationship with Slavery
Ah, the good old thirteen colonies. Land of liberty, home of the brave... except for those who weren't exactly free, you know, the enslaved people. Today, we're diving into the peculiar potpourri of opinions these three colonies – Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Pennsylvania – had on slavery. Buckle up, because it's about to get messier than a spilled pot of Boston baked beans.
 |
| How Did Massachusetts New Hampshire And Pennsylvania React To Slavery |
Massachusetts: From "Hey, This Seems Useful" to "Nah, We're Good"
Massachusetts started out like a frat party host who accidentally buys a keg – enthusiastic but unsure of the long-term consequences. They legalized slavery in 1641, figuring it would be a dandy way to boost the economy. But unlike the South, where slaves toiled on massive plantations, Massachusetts had a more, ahem, boutique approach. Think fancy folks with powdered wigs having one or two enslaved people for domestic service.
However, by the 18th century, the whole slavery thing started to feel a bit unfashionable, like rocking a powdered wig after the whole powdered wig thing went out of style. The number of enslaved people in Massachusetts never skyrocketed, and by the time the Revolutionary War rolled around, most slaves in the state had gained their freedom.
QuickTip: Read step by step, not all at once.
Moral of the Massachusetts Story: Sometimes, peer pressure leads to regrettable decisions, but thankfully, you can grow out of them.
New Hampshire: The Perpetual Maybe
New Hampshire approached slavery with the enthusiasm of a lukewarm cup of tea. They never really outlawed it, but they also never really embraced it. The state had a very small enslaved population, and most residents seemed content with keeping things that way. Think of them as the Switzerland of slavery – happy to stay neutral on the whole thing.
QuickTip: Stop scrolling, read carefully here.
Moral of the New Hampshire Story: Sometimes, the best course of action is to just mind your own beeswax.
Pennsylvania: The Reluctant Participant with a Change of Heart
Pennsylvania was founded by William Penn, a Quaker who believed in, well, Quaker-ly things like peace, love, and not treating people like property. So, naturally, he wasn't exactly thrilled about the whole slavery business. However, as the colony grew, so did the pressure to adopt slave labor. Pennsylvania eventually allowed slavery, but with a bunch of restrictions, like making it super difficult to import enslaved people. By the late 18th century, abolitionist sentiment grew stronger, and slavery was gradually phased out.
Tip: Keep scrolling — each part adds context.
 |
Moral of the Pennsylvania Story: Change takes time, but even the most reluctant participants can eventually come around.
Frequently Asked Questions (because who doesn't love a good FAQ?)
How to tell if your time machine landed you in a pro-slavery colony? Easy! If everyone's wearing fancy hats and complaining about a lack of decent help, you're probably in the South.
QuickTip: Break down long paragraphs into main ideas.
How to convince your colonial ancestors that slavery is a bad idea? Good luck! But maybe try highlighting the whole "taxation without representation" thing – they might be more receptive to arguments about unfairness.
How to make a killer abolitionist slogan? Keep it catchy! Something like "Slavery? More like stinks-a-very!" is sure to get the people thinking.
How to celebrate the end of slavery? Party time! But maybe skip the whole "breaking the chains" metaphor – could be a safety hazard.
How to learn more about slavery in America? Crack open a history book! Or, you know, ask me another question!
 |
