The Boston Strangler: Counting Corpses and Cracking Wise (Because Apparently That Happened in the 60s)
The Boston Strangler. A name that sends shivers down your spine and makes you triple-check your door locks faster than a politician after a tax hike. But how many poor souls fell victim to this 1960s nightmare? Buckle up, true crime enthusiasts (and nervous Nellies), because we're about to delve into the murky waters of strangulation statistics, with a healthy dose of dark humor (because let's face it, sometimes you gotta laugh to keep from screaming).
 |
| How Many Victims Did The Boston Strangler |
The Numbers Game: A Statistical Soiree Gone Wrong
Here's the thing: pinning down an exact body count for the Boston Strangler is trickier than a Rubik's Cube on Jello. Thirteen is the number that gets thrown around the most, but some folks say it could be as high as fifteen. Why the discrepancy? Well, blame it on a bygone era of forensic investigation that made CSI: Miami look like cutting-edge science. Back then, crime scene analysis involved more hunches and whispers than DNA testing and high-tech gadgetry.
QuickTip: Pause after each section to reflect.
So, the official body count is a bit of a guessing game, a macabre party trick that would leave even Agatha Christie scratching her head. Think of it as the original "Schr�dinger's Strangler" - the victims were both there and not there, depending on which investigator you asked.
Tip: Reading on mobile? Zoom in for better comfort.
Enter Albert DeSalvo: The Confessor (or Maybe Not?)
A man named Albert DeSalvo waltzed into the picture claiming responsibility for the whole bloody mess. Now, DeSalvo was a character, let me tell you. This guy confessed to more crimes than a Kardashian has had stylists. The problem? His stories were about as reliable as a used car salesman on a sugar rush. Some details checked out, but others were pure fiction. So, was DeSalvo the real Boston Strangler, or just a glory-hound with a penchant for tall tales? The answer, my friend, is blowing in the wind (and possibly involves a healthy dose of unresolved psychological issues).
Tip: Focus more on ideas, less on words.
DNA evidence eventually linked DeSalvo to at least one of the victims, but the question of whether he was the lone wolf or part of a pack of stranglers remains a topic of debate hotter than a Boston summer.
Tip: Reread if it feels confusing.
 |
The Takeaway: Don't Count Your Chickens (or Strangled Victims) Before They Hatch
The Boston Strangler case is a chilling reminder that sometimes, the truth is as elusive as a good night's sleep after watching a horror movie. The exact number of victims might forever be a mystery, a morbid riddle whispered on the cold streets of Boston.
But hey, at least it's a conversation starter, right? (Just maybe avoid bringing it up on a first date.)
How To: Fun with Strangulation Statistics? (Definitely Not Recommended)
- How to throw a killer party (without the killing): Skip the strangulation theme and stick to glow sticks and good music.
- How to become a detective (the ethical kind): Pursue a degree in criminal justice, not a career in creepy confessions.
- How to sleep soundly at night (despite the lingering creep factor): Invest in a good deadbolt and a guard dog named "Justice."
- How to deal with unresolved historical mysteries: Read a good book, take up a hobby, definitely don't become obsessed.
- How to learn more about the Boston Strangler (the safe way): Hit the library or reputable online sources, not the back alleys of the internet.
 |
