The year is 2008. The global financial system teeters on the brink, and one name echoes through the halls of power and panic: AIG.
So, how exactly did American International Group, a seemingly robust insurance giant, become a central figure in the most devastating financial crisis since the Great Depression? Buckle up, because we're about to embark on a detailed, step-by-step journey through the intricate web of decisions, products, and a desperate scramble that nearly brought the entire system down.
How AIG Contributed to the Financial Crisis: A Step-by-Step Guide
Are you ready to unravel the complex story of AIG's entanglement in the 2008 financial crisis? Let's dive in!
 |
| How Did Aig Contribute To The Financial Crisis |
Step 1: The Lure of Leverage – A Risky Business Model
Before we delve into the specifics, let's understand the core of AIG's pre-crisis strategy. For decades, AIG was a highly respected and profitable insurance company. However, in the years leading up to the crisis, a particular division, AIG Financial Products (AIGFP), began to operate with a remarkably different, and ultimately disastrous, business model.
The Proposition: AIGFP, under the leadership of Joseph Cassano, began to insure against credit defaults. This wasn't traditional property and casualty insurance; it was something far more esoteric and interconnected with the burgeoning, opaque world of structured finance.
The Attraction: The deals were lucrative. AIG was seen as a safe bet, a AAA-rated company, and counterparties were eager to pay for its perceived bulletproof guarantees. This generated massive profits, which in turn incentivized AIGFP to expand its operations rapidly.
The Fatal Flaw: Unlike traditional insurance, where premiums are carefully calculated based on actuarial data and diversified risk, AIGFP's products were highly concentrated and exposed to a single, rapidly deteriorating asset class: subprime mortgages.
Step 2: The Rise of Credit Default Swaps (CDS) – A Ticking Time Bomb
This is where the real trouble begins. AIGFP became a dominant player in the Credit Default Swap (CDS) market.
What is a CDS? Imagine it as an insurance policy against a bond or loan defaulting. If the underlying asset defaults, the protection seller (in this case, AIG) pays the protection buyer. If it doesn't default, AIG collects the premium.
The Buyer's Perspective: Banks and other financial institutions bought CDS from AIG to "insure" their holdings of mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and collateralized debt obligations (CDOs). These MBS and CDOs were bundles of individual mortgages, many of which were subprime (lent to borrowers with poor credit histories). By buying CDS, these institutions could ostensibly reduce the risk associated with their subprime mortgage exposures and even meet regulatory capital requirements more easily.
AIG's Miscalculation: AIG, with its stellar credit rating, was seen as the ultimate guarantor. They believed the housing market would continue its upward trajectory, and defaults would be minimal. They underestimated the systemic risk inherent in the housing bubble and the interconnectedness of these financial products. Crucially, they didn't require much collateral from their counterparties, assuming their AAA rating would suffice. This meant they were receiving premiums, but holding very little in reserve to pay out if the underlying assets went sour.
QuickTip: The more attention, the more retention.
Step 3: Insuring the Uninsurable – CDOs of Subprime Mortgages
AIG's CDS exposure wasn't just to individual mortgages, but to Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs), which were essentially bundles of other mortgage-backed securities, often including many subprime ones.
The Layers of Risk: Think of it like a lasagna of risk. Individual subprime mortgages were bundled into MBS. Then, multiple MBS tranches (slices of the MBS with different risk profiles) were bundled into CDOs. AIG was insuring against default on these complex, opaque CDOs, many of which were comprised of the riskiest, "toxic" tranches.
The "Super Senior" Illusion: AIG largely sold "super senior" CDS tranches. The idea was that these tranches were the least risky parts of a CDO, as they would only default if practically all the underlying mortgages defaulted. AIG believed this provided sufficient protection. This proved to be a catastrophic misjudgment. They never anticipated a widespread, simultaneous collapse of the housing market and the ensuing wave of defaults.
Lack of Transparency: The complexity of these CDOs made it incredibly difficult for AIG, or anyone, to accurately assess the underlying risk. The models used to evaluate these products were flawed, often assuming a low correlation between defaults in different regions, which turned out to be false during a nationwide housing bust.
Step 4: The Housing Market Collapse – The Dominoes Begin to Fall
As the housing bubble began to deflate in 2007 and 2008, the consequences for AIG were dire.
Rising Defaults: Subprime mortgage defaults skyrocketed. Homeowners, unable to afford their adjustable-rate mortgages or facing negative equity, simply walked away from their homes.
Devaluation of MBS and CDOs: With widespread defaults, the value of MBS and CDOs plummeted. The assets that AIG was "insuring" against were now worth a fraction of their original price.
Collateral Calls: The credit rating agencies, seeing the deteriorating financial health of these mortgage-backed securities, began to downgrade them. This triggered clauses in AIG's CDS contracts that required AIG to post collateral to their counterparties. This was the moment of truth. AIG had written trillions of dollars in notional value of CDS, but had very little cash on hand to meet these collateral calls.
Step 5: The Liquidity Crisis – AIG's Desperate Plea
AIG, despite being a profitable traditional insurance company, was facing an unprecedented liquidity crisis due to AIGFP's CDS obligations.
Billions in Calls: The collateral calls amounted to tens of billions of dollars, then hundreds of billions. AIG simply didn't have that kind of cash readily available.
Frozen Credit Markets: The interbank lending market, the lifeblood of the financial system, froze. Banks were unwilling to lend to each other, let alone to a company like AIG that was clearly in distress.
The Threat of Contagion: If AIG failed, its counterparties – major global banks like Goldman Sachs, Soci�t� G�n�rale, Deutsche Bank, and many others – would face massive losses. This would trigger a cascading effect, leading to widespread bankruptcies and a complete collapse of the global financial system. The interconnectedness was staggering.
Step 6: The Government Bailout – A Necessary Evil
With the prospect of an unparalleled financial catastrophe looming, the U.S. government stepped in.
QuickTip: Reading twice makes retention stronger.
The Federal Reserve's Intervention: On September 16, 2008, the Federal Reserve, along with the U.S. Treasury, announced an $85 billion loan to AIG. This was not a bailout to save AIG's management or shareholders, but to prevent the collapse of the entire financial system.
A "Too Big to Fail" Moment: AIG was deemed "too big to fail" because its failure would have had catastrophic systemic consequences. The bailout was, in essence, a bailout of AIG's counterparties, many of whom were also "too big to fail" banks.
The Unpopular Truth: This was an incredibly unpopular decision with the public, who saw it as rewarding reckless behavior. However, policymakers argued that the alternative was far worse – a second Great Depression. The total bailout package eventually grew to over $180 billion.
Step 7: Unwinding the Mess – The Aftermath
The bailout was just the beginning of a long and arduous process of unwinding AIG's toxic assets and stabilizing the company.
Payment to Counterparties: A significant portion of the bailout funds went directly to AIG's CDS counterparties, effectively bailing out these banks.
Restructuring and Asset Sales: AIG embarked on a massive restructuring effort, selling off numerous divisions and assets to repay the government.
Public Scrutiny and Reforms: The AIG debacle led to intense public and political scrutiny, contributing to calls for greater regulation of the financial industry, particularly the OTC derivatives market. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 was a direct result of these failures.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Here are 10 related FAQ questions to further clarify AIG's role in the financial crisis:
How to understand the term "too big to fail" in the context of AIG?
"Too big to fail" means that the failure of a financial institution, like AIG, would have such severe and widespread negative consequences for the entire financial system and economy that the government is compelled to intervene and prevent its collapse, typically through a bailout.
How to differentiate between traditional insurance and AIG's CDS business?
QuickTip: Pause at transitions — they signal new ideas.
Traditional insurance covers specific, measurable risks (e.g., car accidents, house fires) with premiums based on actuarial data and diversified risk pools. AIG's CDS business, particularly in the context of subprime mortgages, was insuring highly complex, opaque, and correlated risks that lacked traditional actuarial models, making them more akin to speculative bets than insurance.
How to explain the role of subprime mortgages in AIG's downfall?
Subprime mortgages were the ultimate underlying assets for many of the mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) that AIG had insured via Credit Default Swaps. When these mortgages defaulted en masse, the value of the MBS and CDOs plummeted, triggering massive collateral calls on AIG's CDS contracts.
How to illustrate the concept of collateral calls?
Imagine AIG sold you an insurance policy on an asset, promising to pay if it defaults. As the asset's value deteriorates and its risk of default increases, the terms of the agreement might require AIG to put up a certain amount of cash (collateral) with you to prove it can meet its obligations if a payout becomes necessary. This is precisely what happened to AIG with its CDS counterparties.
How to describe the interconnectedness of the financial system during the crisis?
AIG's CDS contracts were held by numerous major global banks. If AIG had defaulted on its obligations, these banks would have faced immense losses, potentially triggering their own failures and creating a domino effect that could have brought down the entire global financial system. This highlights the deep and often hidden interdependencies within the financial markets.
QuickTip: Absorb ideas one at a time.
How to identify the key division within AIG responsible for the crisis?
The primary culprit within AIG was AIG Financial Products (AIGFP), which specialized in complex derivatives like Credit Default Swaps (CDS) and was largely unregulated.
How to evaluate the effectiveness of the AIG bailout?
The AIG bailout was highly controversial but widely considered effective in preventing a complete meltdown of the global financial system. While costly to taxpayers, it averted a potentially far more catastrophic economic depression. However, it also raised moral hazard concerns about future reckless behavior by "too big to fail" institutions.
How to compare the AIG crisis to other parts of the 2008 financial crisis?
While distinct, AIG's crisis was intrinsically linked to the broader housing bubble and the subprime mortgage crisis. Its CDS exposure amplified the systemic risk, acting as a pressure cooker that threatened to detonate the entire system when the housing market collapsed. It was a key conduit through which the initial mortgage market problems spread throughout the global financial system.
How to understand the long-term impact of the AIG crisis on financial regulation?
The AIG crisis, alongside other failures, was a significant catalyst for the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010. This legislation aimed to increase oversight of the financial industry, regulate the derivatives market, establish the Financial Stability Oversight Council, and generally make the financial system more resilient.
How to explain the concept of moral hazard in the context of the AIG bailout?
Moral hazard refers to the idea that if an entity believes it will be rescued from the consequences of its risky behavior (e.g., through a government bailout), it may be incentivized to take on even greater risks in the future. The AIG bailout sparked intense debate about moral hazard, as critics argued it set a precedent that encouraged reckless behavior by other large financial institutions.
 |
