The Boston Strangler and DNA: A Case Colder Than a Boston Winter (But Way Less Murdery)
The story of the Boston Strangler is equal parts terrifying and endlessly fascinating. Back in the early 60s, a fearsome phantom stalked the streets, leaving a trail of terror in his wake. But this ain't your typical whodunit. This whodunit became a whodunit-did-he-really-do-it with a healthy dose of "hold on, science wasn't this cool back then." Buckle up, true crime fans, because we're about to dive into the bizarre world of the Strangler and his not-so-smooth relationship with DNA.
 |
| How Did Dna Impact The Boston Strangler |
Enter Albert DeSalvo: The Man, The Myth, The Maybe-Murderer
Albert DeSalvo waltzed into the police station in 1963 with a confession so detailed, you'd think he was reading from the killer's diary (which, spoiler alert, he probably wasn't). DeSalvo claimed responsibility for the Strangler's crimes, providing chilling insights only the real killer could know. Case closed, right? Not quite. Some things just didn't add up, like how some victim descriptions differed from DeSalvo's looks. The case went cold, leaving a nagging question: was DeSalvo the real deal, or just a guy who read the news a little too closely?
The CSI Files: Where Were They When We Needed Them?
Fast forward to the 21st century, the era of fancy gadgets and shows like CSI: Miami that make crime-solving look disturbingly fun. Enter DNA, the superhero of cold cases everywhere. The Boston PD, with a forehead-slapping "why didn't we think of this earlier?" moment, decided to revisit evidence from the Strangler case.
But here's the twist: DNA technology in the 60s wasn't exactly "CSI: Miami" theatrics. Back then, they used a type that narrowed things down to a family tree, not a specific culprit. Think of it as a blurry picture compared to a high-definition close-up.
QuickTip: Skip distractions — focus on the words.
The Smoking...?...Semen Sample?
The PD focused on Mary Sullivan, the last victim attributed to the Strangler. They snagged some DNA evidence (ahem, a semen sample) and ran it through the not-so-high-tech machine. The results? A match to DeSalvo's nephew! Now, this is where it gets interesting. This type of DNA test doesn't pinpoint an individual, but a whole bunch of dudes related in the male line. So, it wasn't a slam dunk, but it was a strong hint that someone in DeSalvo's family tree was involved.
Not wanting to leave any stone unturned (or grave undisturbed), authorities exhumed DeSalvo's body. This time, they got a proper DNA sample and ran a more precise test. And guess what? It was a match! DeSalvo was definitively linked to Sullivan's murder.
So, Did DNA Solve the Entire Case?
Here's the thing: DNA confirmed DeSalvo's involvement in at least one murder. But what about the other 12 attributed to the Strangler? The question of whether he was responsible for all of them remains open. The case is a fascinating example of how DNA can be a powerful tool in cold cases, but also how it has limitations.
Tip: Read the whole thing before forming an opinion.
So, the story isn't a perfect happily-ever-after, but it is a testament to the power of science to bring some closure, even decades later.
FAQ: You've Got Questions, We've Got (Kinda) Snarky Answers
How to solve a cold case?
Wish we had a one-size-fits-all answer, but it depends! New technology like DNA analysis can be a game-changer, but good old-fashioned detective work is still important.
QuickTip: Read again with fresh eyes.
 |
How to be a good true-crime buff?
Stay curious, question everything, and maybe don't jump to conclusions based on a single blurry newspaper photo.
How to avoid becoming a cold case yourself?
QuickTip: Pause at transitions — they signal new ideas.
Probably best to avoid dark alleys and shady characters. But hey, that's just common sense, right?
How to get away with... (insert criminal activity here)?
Look, we're not here to help you commit crimes. We're here to learn about how they're solved (ethically, of course).
How to know if I'm related to a serial killer?
Let's hope not! But seriously, if you're that worried, talk to a genealogist, not us.
 |
