How Did President Lamar And Houston Differ On The Subject Of American Indians

People are currently reading this guide.

Lamar vs. Houston: A Tale of Two Texans and Their Indian Problem

So, you wanna know about Lamar and Houston and their totally different vibes when it came to Native Americans? Buckle up, 'cause this is gonna be a wild ride.

Houston: The Peace-Loving Dude

Let's start with Sam Houston, the chill dude who basically invented the phrase "let's all just get along." This guy was like the anti-war hippie of his time. He was all about peace, love, and understanding – or at least, peace with the Native Americans. Houston figured that fighting them was a waste of time and resources. Instead, he was like, "Hey, let's make friends, trade some stuff, and live happily ever after." He even adopted a Native American son, which is basically the ultimate peace offering, right?

Lamar: The Warmonger

Then we've got Mirabeau B. Lamar, the total opposite of Houston. This guy was like a Texas-sized ball of fire, ready to take on the world – or at least, all the Native Americans. He was convinced that the only way to deal with them was to kick them out of Texas, pronto. Lamar was all about military might and aggressive expansion. He saw the Native Americans as a major obstacle to his vision of a grand, white-dominated Texas. So, he basically declared war on them, which, let's just say, didn't go over too well.

The Great Indian Debate

Basically, Houston was all about diplomacy and trying to coexist with the Native Americans, while Lamar was all about conquest and removal. It was like watching a nature documentary where a lion and a giraffe are trying to share the same watering hole. It just wasn't gonna work.

Lamar's Legacy: A Mixed Bag

While Lamar's aggressive policies might seem like a total fail now, he did contribute to Texas's push for independence. He also founded the University of Texas, which is pretty cool, even if his Indian policy was a total disaster.

Houston's Wisdom: Timeless

Houston's approach, on the other hand, seems way more sensible in hindsight. His policy of peace and negotiation might not have been as exciting as Lamar's, but it definitely saved lives and resources. Plus, his legacy as a peacemaker is pretty legendary.

So, there you have it. The epic showdown between the peace-loving Houston and the war-hungry Lamar. It's a classic tale of two very different approaches to a complex issue. And while we can learn a lot from both of these historical figures, it's safe to say that Houston's philosophy of peaceful coexistence is probably the better model for modern-day leadership.

How To...

  • How to understand Lamar's perspective: Imagine you’re trying to build a house on a property with squatters. You’d probably want them out, right? That's kind of how Lamar saw the Native Americans.
  • How to appreciate Houston's approach: Think about trying to negotiate a peace treaty with your annoying neighbor. It's tough, but it’s usually better than starting a war.
  • How to avoid making the same mistakes: Learn from history! Don't underestimate the value of peaceful relations with indigenous peoples.
  • How to learn more: Check out some books or documentaries about the history of Texas and the Native American experience.
  • How to teach others: Share this post with your friends! Knowledge is power.
4891240807091247002

You have our undying gratitude for your visit!